Re: pg_dump bug fixing

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump bug fixing
Date: 2004-08-03 02:13:59
Message-ID: 410EF4E7.3030309@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>> I find this behavior highly undesirable, and consider it a bug. The
>> globals dump should just add users, and not delete any.
>
>
> Unless the --clean option is passed, yes I agree with you. The other
> issue is that it is silly to have to use pg_dumpall to get the globals.
> A person should be able to pull a pg_dump on a particular database and
> get everything that is required to run that database. Including users.

Another reason to combine pg_dumpall into pg_dump...

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-03 02:15:31 Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-08-03 02:13:27 Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option