Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David F(dot) Skoll" <dfs(at)roaringpenguin(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option
Date: 2004-08-03 02:03:48
Message-ID: 410EF284.5060309@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

>>I just got an autoreply from David stating he will be away until August
>>9 if we want this functionality we have to code it ourselves. If not it
>>can wait until the next major release.
>
> It can wait --- it was submitted after feature freeze anyway, and we
> certainly have more than enough other things to do in the next couple days.

I have a plan to allow pg_dump to dump any object in the next version -
i suspect these two ideas will need reconciliation.

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-08-03 02:04:39 Re: pg_dump bug fixing
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-08-03 02:00:41 Re: pg_dump bug fixing

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-03 02:07:43 Re: Troff -ms output for psql
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-08-03 02:01:14 Re: Troff -ms output for psql