| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems? |
| Date: | 2003-10-21 16:27:45 |
| Message-ID: | 4103.1066753665@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> *sigh* - it's really not my day today. Attached is patch that actually
> compiles and fixes the problem. We will need to bump CATVERSION, and
Reviewed, tested, applied.
> maybe should test all the other qualified functions?
What other qualified functions? There might possibly be some issues in
contrib stuff, but there are no other SQL-language functions defined in
the main system (except information_schema, which we already checked).
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-21 16:29:41 | Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-10-21 16:23:03 | Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-10-22 01:27:39 | Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-21 15:56:25 | Re: AIX port current |