From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
Date: | 2004-07-23 00:05:13 |
Message-ID: | 41005639.9040107@coretech.co.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
I have tested the "cold" backup - and retested my previous scenarios
using "hot" backup (just to be sure) . They all work AFAICS!
cheers
Mark
Simon Riggs wrote:
>On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 21:19, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>>Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz> writes:
>>
>>
>>>2) Is is possible to make the recovery kick in even though pg_control
>>>says the database state is shutdown?
>>>
>>>
>>Yeah, I think you are right: presence of recovery.conf should force a
>>WAL scan even if pg_control claims it's shut down. Fix committed.
>>
>>
>>
>
>This *should* be possible but I haven't tested it.
>
>There is a code path on secondary checkpoints that indicates that crash
>recovery can occur even when the database was shutdown, since the code
>forces recovery whether it was or not. On that basis, this may work, but
>is yet untested. I didn't mention this because it might interfere with
>getting hot backup to work...
>
>Best Regards, Simon Riggs
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-23 02:01:24 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-07-22 23:48:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2004-07-23 01:07:47 | Re: Tutorial |
Previous Message | elein | 2004-07-22 23:57:13 | Re: Tutorial |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-23 02:01:24 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-22 23:53:22 | Re: initdb authentication |