Re: replication only

From: "Henry" <henry(at)zen(dot)co(dot)za>
To: "Jef Peeraer" <jef(dot)peeraer(at)telenet(dot)be>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: replication only
Date: 2008-08-05 04:03:19
Message-ID: 40cc0752755087fc0ebe3b57724ee52f.squirrel@zenmail.co.za
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, August 5, 2008 9:21 am, Jef Peeraer wrote:
>
> i read about the replication possibilities with postgresql. If i just need
> some replication ( without failover stuff ) to 1 standby server, what
> would be the best option to go with. Slony i presume, although schema
> chanages are not propagated.

Skytools (http://pgfoundry.org/projects/skytools/) has a considerably
lower learning curve compared to Slony. Nothing wrong with Slony, but
recovering from replication problems with skytools is far easier, and it's
just much simpler to use -- not as flexible and as powerful as Slony, but
if all you need to do is replicate some tables with minimum fuss and
without having to learn a new language, then Skytools (based on my
personal experience with a cluster and Slony versus Skytools) is my
recommendation.

Regards
Henry

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sim Zacks 2008-08-05 05:37:25 Re: bytea encode performance issues
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2008-08-05 01:44:57 Re: Fwd: Returning Cursor