| From: | "Henry" <henry(at)zen(dot)co(dot)za> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jef Peeraer" <jef(dot)peeraer(at)telenet(dot)be> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: replication only |
| Date: | 2008-08-05 04:03:19 |
| Message-ID: | 40cc0752755087fc0ebe3b57724ee52f.squirrel@zenmail.co.za |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, August 5, 2008 9:21 am, Jef Peeraer wrote:
>
> i read about the replication possibilities with postgresql. If i just need
> some replication ( without failover stuff ) to 1 standby server, what
> would be the best option to go with. Slony i presume, although schema
> chanages are not propagated.
Skytools (http://pgfoundry.org/projects/skytools/) has a considerably
lower learning curve compared to Slony. Nothing wrong with Slony, but
recovering from replication problems with skytools is far easier, and it's
just much simpler to use -- not as flexible and as powerful as Slony, but
if all you need to do is replicate some tables with minimum fuss and
without having to learn a new language, then Skytools (based on my
personal experience with a cluster and Slony versus Skytools) is my
recommendation.
Regards
Henry
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sim Zacks | 2008-08-05 05:37:25 | Re: bytea encode performance issues |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2008-08-05 01:44:57 | Re: Fwd: Returning Cursor |