Re: pg_dump bug fixing

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump bug fixing
Date: 2004-07-19 08:22:59
Message-ID: 40FB84E3.8040808@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Sounds like a job for ... template0 !
>
> Seriously, this thread would be more convincing if anyone in it betrayed
> any knowledge that pg_dump wants you to start from template0 rather than
> template1.

What if we made it so that template1 is always restored last? Won't
that be an improvement?

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2004-07-19 12:28:08 Re: pg_dump bug fixing
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2004-07-19 07:43:41 Re: Why we really need timelines *now* in PITR