| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is "trust" really a good default? |
| Date: | 2004-07-13 01:46:42 |
| Message-ID: | 40F33F02.40706@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>No, but none of the others are better. See previous discussions in the
>>archives. I don't think the situation has changed any since the last
>>time we hashed this out.
>
> If they supply a password to initdb, shouldn't we then require a
> password in pg_hba.conf.
This is further to my previous suggestion that we output the encoding
that is being defaulted to.
NEW USERS DO NOT KNOW THAT -W EXISTS!
Even the majority of experienced users don't!
It's a real pain in the butt that stuff like -E and -W aren't required
parameters to initdb.
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Mascari | 2004-07-13 02:13:11 | Re: Anoncvs down? |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-07-13 01:45:23 | Re: Is "trust" really a good default? |