| From: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #1118: Misleading Commit message |
| Date: | 2004-07-10 23:40:14 |
| Message-ID: | 40F07E5E.2030902@opencloud.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> elein wrote:
>
>>FYI: I'm agreeing w/Tom who is agreeing with me.
>>
>>The tag change should be good. I do hope people are
>>not relying on seeing COMMIT when the transaction
>>rolled back. It does not seem that in this case
>>they would.
>
>
> If it is a problem, hopefully we will hear about it during beta. I will
> mention is as a backward-compatibility issue in the release notes.
The JDBC driver when talking the V2 protocol (unusual for a recent
server, but possible) looks for either COMMIT or ROLLBACK when looking
for end-of-transaction, so it should be fine.
-O
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-10 23:53:06 | Re: [HACKERS] Weird new time zone |
| Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2004-07-10 23:29:35 | Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All |