Re: [PATCHES] Fixes for pg_dump and ownership/acl problems

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Fixes for pg_dump and ownership/acl problems
Date: 2004-07-10 04:39:52
Message-ID: 40EF7318.9020102@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> If there's something missing in the format, I'd be inclined to add it.
> We've never promised to make dumps made by version X readable (or
> usable) by version X-1. We *do* the opposite, however, so you will
> probably still need to parse dump statements from old dump files. Unless
> we can back-patch...
>
> So, rather than carry the hack forward, doing it right for future
> versions would be my vote.

I guess there's no reason not to. I'll see if I can come up with something.

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-07-10 05:16:22 Re: [subxacts] Aborting a function
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-07-10 03:48:10 Re: SAN, clustering, MPI, Backplane Re: Postgresql on SAN