Re: [Plperlng-devel] plperl security

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, plperlng-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Plperlng-devel] plperl security
Date: 2004-07-05 17:55:02
Message-ID: 40E995F6.6030309@commandprompt.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Currently we have this in plperl.c:
> "require Safe;"
>
> I am thinking of submitting a patch to replace this with "use Safe
> 2.09;" to enforce use of a version without the known vulnerability.
>
> Any objections?

I have none, except will 2.09 work with 5.00503?

>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plperlng-devel mailing list
> Plperlng-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org
> http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/plperlng-devel

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment Content-Type Size
jd.vcf text/x-vcard 640 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-07-05 18:12:50 Re: [Plperlng-devel] plperl security
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-07-05 17:49:49 plperl security