From: | Edoardo Ceccarelli <eddy(at)expot(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | finding a max value |
Date: | 2004-07-02 18:50:26 |
Message-ID: | 40E5AE72.1080206@expot.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-bugs pgsql-performance |
This is the query:
select max(KA) from annuncio
field KA is indexed and is int4,
explaining gives:
explain select max(KA) from annuncio;
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aggregate (cost=21173.70..21173.70 rows=1 width=4)
-> Seq Scan on annuncio (cost=0.00..20326.76 rows=338776 width=4)
(2 rows)
wasn't supposed to do an index scan? it takes about 1sec to get the result.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bender, Cheryl | 2004-07-02 18:56:52 | Re: Dumping partial database content |
Previous Message | Michael A Nachbaur | 2004-07-02 18:31:57 | Re: SERIAL type not autoincremented |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dario Fassi | 2004-07-03 01:14:54 | Error in DatabaseMetaData.getColumns() with Views |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2004-07-02 17:02:56 | Re: Grant Update (Possible bug)? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-07-03 14:51:50 | Re: BUG #1186: Broken Index? |
Previous Message | CoL | 2004-07-02 14:23:44 | Re: Mysterious performance of query because of plsql function in |