How to determine field names in a trigger?

From: Justin Clift <jc(at)telstra(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: How to determine field names in a trigger?
Date: 2004-06-29 03:59:11
Message-ID: 40E0E90F.4020003@telstra.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi all,

I'm creating a centralised table to keep a log of changes in other tables.

In thinking about the PL/pgSQL trigger to write and attach to the
monitored tables (probably a row level AFTER trigger), I can see two
approaches:

a) Write a separate PL/pgSQL function for each table, with the hard
coded field names in the function.

or

b) Write one PL/pgSQL function that can be used in the triggers for
all of the monitored tables.

It sounds like b) would be most time effective to write and maintain,
but in looking through the PG docs I haven't seen anything that says how
to determine the field names in the OLD nor NEW records, nor how many
fields there are:

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/plpgsql-trigger.html

For example, let's say I have two tables. One is called table_a, and
has two columns, and the other is table_b and has three columns. The
advantage of having the PL/pgSQL trigger knowing the number of fields
and their names in the OLD or NEW rows would be in being able to do this:

(pseudo code)

LOOP
-- If we've processed all the fields, then exit
IF i > OLD.number_of_fields
EXIT;
END IF;

-- Check if the next field was changed, and if so, record it
IF OLD.nextfield <> NEW.nextfield
INSERT INTO log_table (table, field, old_val, new_val)
VALUES (TG_RELNAME, nextfield, OLD.nextfield,
NEW.nextfield);
END IF;

-- Increment the loop counter
i := i + 1;
END LOOP

Are there any way to do this kind of thing for triggers with PL/pgSQL at
present?

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Együd Csaba 2004-06-29 04:52:56 Re: Performance problem on RH7.1
Previous Message Carl E. McMillin 2004-06-29 00:04:45 Re: Seeing uncommitted transactions