Re: Fixing pg_dump

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fixing pg_dump
Date: 2004-06-25 04:03:57
Message-ID: 40DBA42D.1090105@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> If there's not a big performance penalty, sure. Being fully compatible
> with existing archive files is a sufficient win to justify sins much
> worse than this one.

Out of interest - have you developed an opinion on the
pg_get_serial_sequence thing? Also, what's the latest I can get pg_dump
fixes in?

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-06-25 06:22:50 Re: 7.5-dev, pg_dumpall, dollarquoting
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-06-25 04:01:47 Re: Fixing pg_dump