Re: virtual fields on VIEW?

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: raptor <raptor(at)tvskat(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: virtual fields on VIEW?
Date: 2004-06-21 19:34:51
Message-ID: 40D7385B.10502@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

raptor wrote:
>
> ]- re: to myself... In fact I was using postgres in the past afaik
> 6.x versions or so (no outer joins, rule system was still not fully
> working ... it was good on paper was good but, ... now glad it has
> advanced so much :")).. then i got using Inter Base(FireBird).
> (really cool db :") ) From what I see 7.x series has made huge step
> forward.. probably now surpacing firebird on features side.. (they
> had hard time adapting Interbase code) (no flame pls!)

Firebird is the only viable open-source alternative to PG that I can
think of (which has been a viable project for any length of time).

> AFAIK firebird(interbase) and postgres are the only DB with
> multiversioning engines, is that true ?

I think Oracle has its version.

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heiko Pohl 2004-06-21 20:23:42 Re: Problem while OS-Update
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2004-06-21 19:29:54 Re: New to the list; would this be an okay question?