Re: pg_ctl vs. Windows locking

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl vs. Windows locking
Date: 2004-06-17 19:02:56
Message-ID: 40D1EAE0.8050909@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

Tom Lane wrote:

>>Right, we can just close the pipe. I was thinking of adding another
>>signal but that's obviously easier. Will work on making this happen.
>>
>>
>
>... except there is no postmaster pipe anymore --- back to plan A.
>
>
>

Did we get a resolution on this?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2004-06-17 20:58:12 PostgreSQL SCM
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2004-06-17 16:46:00 problem compiling C++ modules in /contrib