From: | Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: weired behavior... after pg_resetxlog-> dump->initdb-->reload. |
Date: | 2004-06-17 03:43:43 |
Message-ID: | 40D1136F.3040708@trade-india.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>It does.
>>
>>
>
>And?
>
>
>
Yep the problem of original posting could be replicated on
disabling hash aggregates. On disabling i could get the repeated rows.
Regds
Mallah.
rt2=# SET enable_hashagg TO off;
SET
Time: 329.533 ms
rt2=# explain analyze SELECT name from users_sample group by name having
count(*) > 1 ;
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| QUERY
PLAN |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| GroupAggregate (cost=69.83..78.33 rows=200 width=78) (actual
time=2411.411..2749.733 rows=4 loops=1) |
| Filter: (count(*) >
1)
|
| -> Sort (cost=69.83..72.33 rows=1000 width=78) (actual
time=2411.300..2532.821 rows=100489 loops=1) |
| Sort Key:
name
|
| -> Seq Scan on users_sample (cost=0.00..20.00 rows=1000
width=78) (actual time=0.024..170.258 rows=100489 loops=1) |
| Total runtime: 2915.439
ms
|
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
(6 rows)
Time: 3265.102 ms
rt2=# SELECT name from users_sample group by name having count(*) > 1 ;
+----------------------+
| name |
+----------------------+
| ??? |
| ????163.com |
| ?(at)hotmail(dot)com |
| p? |
+----------------------+
(4 rows)
Time: 3358.030 ms
rt2=# SET enable_hashagg TO on;
SET
Time: 330.148 ms
rt2=# SELECT name from users_sample group by name having count(*) > 1 ;
+------+
| name |
+------+
+------+
(0 rows)
Time: 752.395 ms
rt2=#
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hm. Does EXPLAIN show that the GROUP BY query is using hash
>>>aggregation? Does its behavior change if you turn off enable_hashagg?
>>>
>>>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Olivier Hubaut | 2004-06-17 06:46:47 | Re: VARCHAR -vs- CHAR: huge performance difference? |
Previous Message | Adam Smith | 2004-06-17 03:35:37 | PostgresSQL 7.3.x removal |