From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: logfile rotation |
Date: | 2004-06-16 19:03:52 |
Message-ID: | 40D09998.7090107@pse-consulting.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
>
>
>>>Answering my own question, the distribution of the current logfile
>>>name could be done trough a file handle.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>would you mind commenting on my suggestion so I can continue on that topic?
>>
>>
>
>There is no portable way to redistribute a file handle.
>
>
Seems I didn't make clear enough what I mean.
I'd fopen a file handle in the postmaster, and all subsequent processes
will inherit that handle just as they do for stderr; no redistribution
required.
The log filename is written to that file when pg_logfile_rotate is called:
fseek(fh, 0, SEEK_SET);
fprintf(fh, "%s", newlogfilname);
fflush();
and all subprocesses may retrieve the filename when required by
char buf[MAXPGPATH];
fseek(fh, 0, SEEK_SET);
fread(buf, 1, MAXPGPATH, fh);
buf[MAXPGPATH-1]=0; // prevent buffer overflow
logfile=fopen(buf, "a+");
Regards,
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-16 19:17:53 | Re: Tablespaces |
Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-06-16 18:49:39 | Re: Improving postgresql.conf |