| From: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | C_LOCALE vs. UTF8 |
| Date: | 2004-06-15 02:55:06 |
| Message-ID: | 40CE650A.5000607@fireserve.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
HMMMMmmmm......,
There was a post running about using C_LOCALE is the only way to use
LIKE, and I put something similar to the below in comment to it. It
never showed up on the list. Oh well.
If I wanted a multinational database capable of many langauges,and
wanted the most functionality of sorts, order bys, indexes, LIKE, etc,
what is the best encooding?
I would have THOUGHT it would be UTF8, but maybe C_LOCALE?
Is there a chart somewhere showing the main differences between using
C_LOCALE and any other encoding? A nice simple table in the manual
would be really nice. If you give me the particulars, I'll write the table.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2004-06-15 03:42:24 | Re: Can you help me with this query? |
| Previous Message | Tom Allison | 2004-06-15 01:51:34 | Re: perl access |