From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Allison <tallison(at)tacocat(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: perl access |
Date: | 2004-06-15 01:20:14 |
Message-ID: | 40CE4ECE.4070902@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello,
I do not believe that to be the case. DBD::SPI is experimental but DBD:
Pg is quite stable
and I believe DBD is a requirement that works WITH DBI.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Tom Allison wrote:
> I'm used to using the DBI modules in perl.
> The online docs mention DBD as expiremental.
>
> I'm thinking of sticking with DBI, unless there's some compelling
> reason to do otherwise.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | mike.griffin | 2004-06-15 01:48:33 | Can you help me with this query? |
Previous Message | Tom Allison | 2004-06-15 00:59:46 | pg_hba auth failure |