From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | jao(at)geophile(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Trying to minimize the impact of checkpoints |
Date: | 2004-06-12 17:27:22 |
Message-ID: | 40CB3CFA.7040201@Yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 6/11/2004 2:02 PM, jao(at)geophile(dot)com wrote:
> Quoting jao(at)geophile(dot)com:
>
>> When a checkpoint occurs, all operations slow way, way down.
>> The attached spreadsheet (xls file, prepared in OO so unlikely
>> to be dangerous) shows a run of a few hours, and the various spikes
>> every 25-30 minutes seem consistent with checkpointing. The
>> application is doing 1/2 reads and 1/2 inserts during this time.
>
> Sorry for being cryptic in my message. The spreadsheet contains
> iostat output.
Did you try to play with the background writer config options (new in
7.5) at all?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-12 17:33:21 | Re: Opteron scaling with PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2004-06-12 17:09:50 | Re: postgres .sql files -test database |