From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: serverlog function (log_destination file) |
Date: | 2004-06-07 15:47:15 |
Message-ID: | 40C48E03.2060802@pse-consulting.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
>
>
>>What if there's no file access
>>
>>
>
>If you don't have any access to the machine then you are not really a
>DBA, you only play one on TV.
>
However you may call me, I can think of many cases where I'd like to
look at the server log, without wanting to change the configuration or
start/stop the postmaster. The error message sent to the application
might be lost, or an interference with another app might have caused
troubles, so a collected log is fine for such cases, preferrably
displayed by the same tool I'm tuning my queries with.
What you're telling me is that people should have a telnet session to
the linux box and tail /usr/data/pgsql/serverlog, while they're working
with comfortable gui tools otherwise. Sound dissatisfying.
The rhdb control center seems fine for a sysadmin-dbadmin who's going to
install and reconfigure a machine, but I certainly don't want this for
SQL centric work. And a Java GUI is a bad idea on win32 either...
Regards,
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-06-07 15:50:06 | Re: Case preserving - suggestions |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-06-07 15:42:40 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Failures with windows port |