Re: How is the repo tree maintained?

From: Jeff Frost <jeff(at)pgexperts(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-pkg-yum <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How is the repo tree maintained?
Date: 2014-09-03 15:44:05
Message-ID: 40B9896F-2F55-451E-9441-5AA480771326@pgexperts.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-pkg-yum


> On Sep 3, 2014, at 0:56, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> The specific case I was thinking of turned out to be where the i386 repo
> for rhel5 contained postgresql91-9.1.13 and postgresql91-9.1.14, but the
> x86_64 repo contained postgresql91-9.1.13 only.
>
> Presumably that was a case where only one arch got built.

It was built but did not get uploaded because the repo xml file was missing. Pretty sure I updated the list when I found that.

In response to

Browse pgsql-pkg-yum by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martín Marqués 2014-09-03 18:18:05 barman package
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2014-09-03 11:18:37 Re: RHEL5 postgresql94-contrib is broken, unsatisfied dependency on uuid-ossp