From: | "Dan Langille" <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: have you seen this? |
Date: | 2004-05-28 10:44:39 |
Message-ID: | 40B6DFD7.14369.136ADF92@localhost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 28 May 2004 at 10:36, Alexey Borzov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Neil Conway wrote:
> >> I'd like to suggest doing the same things in technical perspective:
> >> why implementing the functionality on client side is *bad*, length of
> >> MySQL's release cycles, creating some "switching" stories, this kind
> >> of stuff.
> >
> >
> > I am opposed to "advocating PostgreSQL" in this manner (regardless of
> > how effective it may or may not be). Promoting PostgreSQL ought to be
> > centered on explaining why PostgreSQL is a good DBMS, not trash-talking
> > the competition.
>
> And that is the problem with PostgreSQL advocacy effort: they explain why their
> product is *good*, while everyone else explains why their product is *better*.
>
> See my point?
One can explain why your product is better without trashing the
competition.
See our point?
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
BSDCan - http://www.bsdcan.org/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | efesar (the kay) | 2004-05-28 14:49:43 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] win32 port getting popular |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-05-28 06:47:27 | Re: have you seen this? |