Re: have you seen this?

From: "Dan Langille" <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
To: Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: have you seen this?
Date: 2004-05-28 10:44:39
Message-ID: 40B6DFD7.14369.136ADF92@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 28 May 2004 at 10:36, Alexey Borzov wrote:

> Hi!
>
> Neil Conway wrote:
> >> I'd like to suggest doing the same things in technical perspective:
> >> why implementing the functionality on client side is *bad*, length of
> >> MySQL's release cycles, creating some "switching" stories, this kind
> >> of stuff.
> >
> >
> > I am opposed to "advocating PostgreSQL" in this manner (regardless of
> > how effective it may or may not be). Promoting PostgreSQL ought to be
> > centered on explaining why PostgreSQL is a good DBMS, not trash-talking
> > the competition.
>
> And that is the problem with PostgreSQL advocacy effort: they explain why their
> product is *good*, while everyone else explains why their product is *better*.
>
> See my point?

One can explain why your product is better without trashing the
competition.

See our point?
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
BSDCan - http://www.bsdcan.org/

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message efesar (the kay) 2004-05-28 14:49:43 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] win32 port getting popular
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2004-05-28 06:47:27 Re: have you seen this?