From: | Sean Shanny <shannyconsulting(at)earthlink(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Problem with sequences on a reload of a pg_dump file |
Date: | 2004-05-26 22:12:15 |
Message-ID: | 40B5163F.7030406@earthlink.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom,
It looks like I probably caused this. :-( I was not paying attention
and rebooted the machine while it was doing the index building. :-(
This is about an 1/2 TB warehouse instance so I am going to look at the
last several thousand lines of the dump file to see if I can replay what
I need to correct the situation. Not a good day.
--sean
Tom Lane wrote:
>Sean Shanny <shannyconsulting(at)earthlink(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>My problem is that all the sequences were reset to start a 1. :-( Did
>>I do something wrong as this has never happened before?
>>
>>
>
>Did the reload actually complete, or did it fail partway through?
>
>
>
>>Also, can I
>>simply figure out what the next value should be and manually update the
>>last_value column in each affected sequence?
>>
>>
>
>No, but you could use setval().
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dennis Gearon | 2004-05-26 22:25:22 | One more time on ONE-TO-MANY |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-05-26 22:10:45 | Re: temas del comando COPY |