From: | Jean-Luc Lachance <jllachan(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Andreas <maps(dot)on(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Multitable uniqueness ? |
Date: | 2004-05-26 14:00:29 |
Message-ID: | 40B4A2FD.8030004@sympatico.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Do you really need MANY-TO-MANY between customers and projects?
I can see customers owning many projects, but do you really have
projects belonging to many customers?
If not, fold cust_proj into projects.
Otherwise, UNIQUE (cp_id, stall_no) on stalls should be enough.
Andreas wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Is there a way to have something like this : UNIQUE (table_1.id,
> table_2.xxx)
>
> I got some tables that have a couple of foreign keys. Now I try to
> minimize those relationships to clean up the mess. :-}
> We do business fairs. (???) Like c-bit only a few magnitudes smaller.
> So we have projects and rent stalls to customers.
>
> customers (c_id, ...)
> projects (p_id,...)
>
> there is an relation cust_proj (cp_id, c_fk, p_fk, status_fk)
> with a UNIQUE constraint (c_fk, p_fk)
>
> A customer can have several orders, contacts, ... tied to a project.
>
> Those look like this stalls (stall_id, cp_id, stall_no, ...)
> o_id PRIMARY
> cp_fk FOREIGN KEY that ties to custmer and project
>
> stall_no is a varchar
> It should be unique within a project.
>
> Will I have to integrate the project.id into the stalls-table ?
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Manuel Sugawara | 2004-05-26 15:20:50 | Re: trigger function building |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-05-26 13:56:17 | Re: Multitable uniqueness ? |