| From: | Tom Jenkins <tjenkins(at)devis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | postgresql, xfs and lvm |
| Date: | 2004-05-24 17:35:39 |
| Message-ID: | 40B2326B.2000808@devis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
I read with great interest the archived postings about the use XFS over
LVM and snapshotting the PGDATA dirs for backups. However I saw on
XFS's mailing list on May 13th that Murthy said that they now don't use
that procedure and instead rsync, xfs_freeze (to freeze), rsync,
xfs_freeze (to unfreeze).
Anyone else having problems with lvm and snapshots?
- --
Tom Jenkins
devIS - Development Infostructure
http://www.devis.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0-nr2 (Windows XP)
Comment: Using GnuPG with MultiZilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAsjJrV7Yk9/McDYURAmx1AJ4hBVe1PNyTJYkt8rkv5SraPr3QSgCg024K
KwMsZQDYHerFkI1lAMqUrmg=
=jSXj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | twinsen | 2004-05-24 19:07:03 | Reliable database communication - Slightly OT |
| Previous Message | Ericson Smith | 2004-05-24 17:13:12 | Re: Clustering Postgres |