| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
| Date: | 2004-05-18 21:33:57 |
| Message-ID: | 40AA8145.5020504@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> But most binary packages do, and they are the ones I'm talking about.
> And surely you do not advocate that, in order to build PL/PHP, the
> packagers instead disable the client side support in PHP?
Of course not, but I still don't see your point. plPHP doesn't need
PHP+PostgreSQL support. Nor does PHP+PostgreSQL conflict with using plPHP...
PHP doesn't even need to be installed for plPHP to work... You just
need the source tree for building.
So I am confused...
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-05-18 21:39:25 | Re: Relocatable installs |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-05-18 21:28:33 | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |