From: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] pg_autovacuum Win32 service patch #2 |
Date: | 2004-05-13 20:39:33 |
Message-ID: | 40A3DD05.2020508@zeut.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Dave Page wrote:
>Any comments/criticisms/gasps of horror at all the win32 code? :-)
>
Sorry for not jumping in sooner but I have been offline for several days.
Anyway, not having looked at this at all, how will this be effected when
pg_autovacuum is integrated into the backend. I assume that the
postmaster can be run as a win32 service, and if it launches and kills
pg_autovacuum automatically, do you need to do anything for pg_autovacuum?
Matthew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Brusser | 2004-05-13 20:58:41 | Re: negative pid? |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-05-13 20:35:08 | Re: mingw configure failure detection |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-05-13 22:59:31 | Re: mingw configure failure detection |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-05-13 20:35:08 | Re: mingw configure failure detection |