From: | Bjoern Metzdorf <bm(at)turtle-entertainment(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Pgsql-Admin (E-mail)" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] Quad processor options |
Date: | 2004-05-11 21:11:12 |
Message-ID: | 40A14170.7000201@turtle-entertainment.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-performance |
scott.marlowe wrote:
>>Next drives I'll buy will certainly be 15k scsi drives.
>
> Better to buy more 10k drives than fewer 15k drives. Other than slightly
> faster select times, the 15ks aren't really any faster.
Good to know. I'll remember that.
>>In peak times we can get up to 700-800 connections at the same time.
>>There are quite some updates involved, without having exact numbers I'll
>>think that we have about 70% selects and 30% updates/inserts.
>
> Wow, a lot of writes then.
Yes, it certainly could also be only 15-20% updates/inserts, but this is
also not negligible.
> Sure, adaptec makes one, so does lsi megaraid. Dell resells both of
> these, the PERC3DI and the PERC3DC are adaptec, then lsi in that order, I
> believe. We run the lsi megaraid with 64 megs battery backed cache.
The LSI sounds good.
> Intel also makes one, but I've heard nothing about it.
It could well be the ICP Vortex one, ICP was bought by Intel some time ago..
> I haven't directly tested anything but the adaptec and the lsi megaraid.
> Here at work we've had massive issues trying to get the adaptec cards
> configured and installed on, while the megaraid was a snap. Installed RH,
> installed the dkms rpm, installed the dkms enabled megaraid driver and
> rebooted. Literally, that's all it took.
I didn't hear anything about dkms for debian, so I will be hand-patching
as usual :)
Regards,
Bjoern
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-05-11 21:29:46 | Re: [PERFORM] Quad processor options |
Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-05-11 21:02:24 | Re: [PERFORM] Quad processor options |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-05-11 21:29:46 | Re: [PERFORM] Quad processor options |
Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-05-11 21:02:24 | Re: [PERFORM] Quad processor options |