| From: | Bjoern Metzdorf <bm(at)turtle-entertainment(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Anjan Dave <adave(at)vantage(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Pgsql-Admin (E-mail)" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] Quad processor options |
| Date: | 2004-05-11 20:45:13 |
| Message-ID: | 40A13B59.4060803@turtle-entertainment.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-performance |
Anjan Dave wrote:
> Did you mean to say the trigger-based clustering solution
> is loading the dual CPUs 60-70% right now?
No, this is without any triggers involved.
> Performance will not be linear with more processors,
> but it does help with more processes.
> We haven't benchmarked it, but we haven't had any
> problems also so far in terms of performance.
From the amount of processes view, we certainly can saturate a quad
setup :)
> Price would vary with your relation/yearly purchase, etc,
> but a 6650 with 2.0GHz/1MB cache/8GB Memory, RAID card,
> drives, etc, should definitely cost you less than 20K USD.
Which is still very much. Anyone have experience with a self built quad
xeon, using the Tyan Thunder board?
Regards,
Bjoern
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bjoern Metzdorf | 2004-05-11 20:46:35 | Re: [PERFORM] Quad processor options |
| Previous Message | Bjoern Metzdorf | 2004-05-11 20:41:28 | Re: [PERFORM] Quad processor options |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bjoern Metzdorf | 2004-05-11 20:46:35 | Re: [PERFORM] Quad processor options |
| Previous Message | Bjoern Metzdorf | 2004-05-11 20:41:28 | Re: [PERFORM] Quad processor options |