Re: Is there any method to keep table in memory at startup

From: Vinay Jain <vinayj(at)sarathi(dot)ncst(dot)ernet(dot)in>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Hammond <ahammond(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>, vinayj(at)ncst(dot)ernet(dot)in, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is there any method to keep table in memory at startup
Date: 2004-05-06 13:25:47
Message-ID: 409A3CDB.1000906@sarathi.ncst.ernet.in
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>Vinay Jain <vinayj(at)sarathi(dot)ncst(dot)ernet(dot)in> writes:
>
>
>>Which takes a lot of time the reason is that in every indchar_lt
>>function call SPI connection is made and destroyed...
>>
>>
>
>I cannot imagine how you'd think that that would be practical from a
>performance standpoint.
>
>
>
>>Here is the problem which i found in postgresql...
>>after setting collating sequence in proper way(i.e. C) the order was
>>on basis of unicode values...but in Hindi Language some of combined
>>unicode values makes a single character
>>similarly length is not appropriate for these reasons & hence
>>substring operations
>>
>>
>
>Why don't you just use a Hindi locale? The infrastructure should all be
>there already for you.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Hi
Not actually even in Hindi Locale the output was incorrect..i.e. sort
order was wrong
and also length and substring operations
which are not based on syllables.

>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vinay Jain 2004-05-06 13:33:06 Re: Is there any method to keep table in memory at startup
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-05-06 13:06:57 Re: Is there any method to keep table in memory at startup