From: | Vinay Jain <vinayj(at)sarathi(dot)ncst(dot)ernet(dot)in> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Hammond <ahammond(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>, vinayj(at)ncst(dot)ernet(dot)in, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is there any method to keep table in memory at startup |
Date: | 2004-05-06 13:25:47 |
Message-ID: | 409A3CDB.1000906@sarathi.ncst.ernet.in |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Vinay Jain <vinayj(at)sarathi(dot)ncst(dot)ernet(dot)in> writes:
>
>
>>Which takes a lot of time the reason is that in every indchar_lt
>>function call SPI connection is made and destroyed...
>>
>>
>
>I cannot imagine how you'd think that that would be practical from a
>performance standpoint.
>
>
>
>>Here is the problem which i found in postgresql...
>>after setting collating sequence in proper way(i.e. C) the order was
>>on basis of unicode values...but in Hindi Language some of combined
>>unicode values makes a single character
>>similarly length is not appropriate for these reasons & hence
>>substring operations
>>
>>
>
>Why don't you just use a Hindi locale? The infrastructure should all be
>there already for you.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Hi
Not actually even in Hindi Locale the output was incorrect..i.e. sort
order was wrong
and also length and substring operations
which are not based on syllables.
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vinay Jain | 2004-05-06 13:33:06 | Re: Is there any method to keep table in memory at startup |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-05-06 13:06:57 | Re: Is there any method to keep table in memory at startup |