Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Cc: sdv mailer <sdvmailer(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup
Date: 2004-05-05 21:23:03
Message-ID: 40995B37.2000706@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> The fact that windows has a heavy process / lightweight thread design
> means little to me, since I'll likely never deploy a production postgresql
> server on it that needs to handle any serious load.

Yes but Solaris also has a heavy process / lightweight thread design.

J

>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment Content-Type Size
jd.vcf text/x-vcard 640 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2004-05-05 22:07:33 Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-05-05 21:20:16 Re: initdb failure in CVS