Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...
Date: 2010-09-08 15:42:14
Message-ID: 4096.1283960534@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> here is the patch again.

This patch seems remarkably documentation-free. What is it trying to
accomplish and what is it doing to the planner data structures?
(Which do have documentation BTW.) Also, what will it do to runtime
in normal cases where the pathkeys list isn't that long?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2010-09-08 15:57:47 Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-09-08 15:39:35 Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...