Re: License question

From: Shachar Shemesh <psql(at)shemesh(dot)biz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: License question
Date: 2004-04-22 13:19:21
Message-ID: 4087C659.5060902@shemesh.biz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>Shachar Shemesh <psql(at)shemesh(dot)biz> writes:
>
>
>>In particular, the front page claims that PostgreSQL is under the BSD
>>license. The problem is that there are two.
>>
>>
>
>We use the one shown in the COPYRIGHT file in the top directory of the
>source tree, which is also available for your reading pleasure by
>clicking on the "license" link on that same front page.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
Ok, let me explain the issue in a finer point.

The license given in the web link you mention seems to mandate all
related work to be under the same license, which is nowhere near what
BSD means. In particular, this puts some doubt on whether I can use the
code in an LGPL project.

Can anyone shed more light on this point for me? Am I misreading
something? If it is possible to put code into an LGPL project, what is
the requirement?

--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting
http://www.lingnu.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ssinger 2004-04-22 13:26:08 Re: [Pgreplication-general] converting the DBMirror as peer-to-peer
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-04-22 12:58:36 Re: License question