Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Date: 2004-04-22 12:55:22
Message-ID: 4087C0BA.3010207@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

>On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:29:36AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>
>
>>I am thinking they could untar into a directory under pgsgl/ or have a
>>way to point to a 'configure'-run source tree and pull values from
>>there.
>>
>>If you include pg_config.h, or use Makefile.global, you have almost
>>everything you need to compile your own, including flags, configure
>>checks, and the location of the installation directory.
>>
>>
>
>That would work only if they compiled the source themselves, as opposed
>to using a binary package (which is very common). I'm not sure if
>installing the postgresql-dev or postgresql-devel package would be
>enough.
>
>If not, maybe pg_config could provide all the necessary info ...
>
>
>

The pieces of the current build environment, used or possibly required
by any contrib module (including scripts like mkldexport.sh and such)
whold have to be installed under $datadir/devel or the like and made
location independent. That's all.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-04-22 12:58:36 Re: License question
Previous Message Shachar Shemesh 2004-04-22 09:35:20 License question