From: | Shachar Shemesh <shachar(at)lingnu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | License question |
Date: | 2004-04-22 09:12:37 |
Message-ID: | 40878C85.8020805@lingnu.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Haim,
Is the PostgreSQL license (http://www.postgresql.org/licence.html) LGPL
compatible? I have adapted some code (for jdate manipulation) into the
OLE DB project (LGPL). I have copied over the copyright notice, but now
I'm thinking that this may not be enough.
On the front page of the site (http://www.postgresql.org/) it says
"*Licence <http://www.postgresql.org/licence.html>* PostgreSQL is
distributed under the flexible BSD licence." but the license is not the
BSD license proper.
It seems close, though not identical, to the X11 license
(http://www.x.org/Downloads_terms.html) which the FSF define as "GPL
compatible" (http://www.fsf.org/licenses/license-list.html) Yet, the
X11 license requires an inclusion of a certain paragraph, which is not
mandated by the LGPL, and which gives permissions not granted by the GPL.
I'm confused.
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting
http://www.lingnu.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2004-04-22 09:24:29 | Re: GUC variable set, TODO |
Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2004-04-22 07:53:45 | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |