| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |
| Date: | 2004-04-21 23:31:30 |
| Message-ID: | 40870452.8070509@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> The thing is, for how many ppl are seperate packages difficult? I know
> for me, under FreeBSD, I cd to a /usr/ports/databases/pg_autovacuum and
> type 'make install' and its done ... I thought that stuff like Redhat had
> the full screen installer that lists things?
Well, if setup correctly for redhat, debian or even SuSE you would type:
apt-get install pg_autovacuum
or with redhat you might also do
yum install pg_autovacuum
But that is packaging and that is up to the developers of the particular
project.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> My point is that all of this stuff shouldn't be in the core CVS ... its a
> packaging issue, not a cvs one ...
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-04-21 23:54:38 | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-04-21 23:21:15 | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |