From: | Heflin <hhogan(at)tampabay(dot)rr(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Join issue on a maximum value |
Date: | 2004-04-21 20:28:10 |
Message-ID: | 4086D95A.5000609@tampabay.rr.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 14:29:34 -0400,
> Heflin <hhogan(at)tampabay(dot)rr(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>>So a basic JOIN gets this:
>>
>>SELECT auction.auction_id, image.image_id, image.image_descr
>>FROM auction JOIN image ON auction.auction_id = image.auction_id
>>WHERE auction.auction_owner = 'Mabel';
>>
>>Now the problem: I can't seem to remember how to get only the max value
>>for the image_id for each auction_id so that the result set would be:
>>
>>
>
>The postgres specific way of doing this is:
>SELECT DISTINCT ON (auction.auction_id)
> auction.auction_id, image.image_id, image.image_descr
> FROM auction JOIN image ON auction.auction_id = image.auction_id
> WHERE auction.auction_owner = 'Mabel'
> ORDER BY auction.auction_id, image.image_id DESC
>;
>
>The more standard way to do it would be joining auction and image
>with a group by and max to get the highest image_id and then joining
>that result to image again to get the corresponding description.
>
>
>
Thanks!
I was actually trying to do it the more standard way, but I've been
bungling up the syntax. I'm going to play with that some more, since it
might be useful elsewhere.
The thing that disturbs me about your syntax is that I don't really see
an assurance that I'll get the correct image_id. Any chance you can
tell me why this works?
Thanks again,
-Heflin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Blake | 2004-04-21 23:41:57 | Proper SQL syntax requested |
Previous Message | Kemin Zhou | 2004-04-21 20:07:01 | rule's behavior with join interesting |