Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Date: 2004-04-21 19:47:09
Message-ID: 4086CFBD.8040205@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>
> tsearch, I believe, is maintained somewhere else already, no? same with
> tsearch2?

Yes that is correct but I think they commit back to contrib before they
release.

Realistically, although I did not used to agree, I believe that the only
that that should come with PostgreSQL is PostgreSQL and required items
for PostgreSQL.

IMHO: PostgreSQL should include:

PostgreSQL
Psql
All development headers
C/C++ Libs

Everything else should be on SourceForge or Gforge or whatever. The
possible exception would be the pl stuff.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-04-21 19:49:06 Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-04-21 19:32:22 Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions