From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Carlos <Carlos(at)pbsinet(dot)com> |
Cc: | "'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Redundancy software for PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2004-04-21 18:25:19 |
Message-ID: | 4086BC8F.1020508@Yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Carlos wrote:
> Hello Forum,
>
> I would appreciate it if you could recommend software to build redundancy in
> my application (my application stores data in a PostgreSQL v7.3.x database
> running in Linux RedHat) The software would replicate or copy the database
> from a main server into a second server. And when the main server goes
> down, the redundant database could still be available in a view mode --
> where most tables cannot be updated and only a couple of tables can be
> modified. In this way, when the main server goes down, the users could
> still view data and when the main server goes back on-line, I can update a
> couple of tables of the main database with the data from the redundant
> database.
>
> Thanks in advance for your response.
>
Why not doing a full failover?
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/slony1/projdisplay.php
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-04-21 18:45:48 | Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters? |
Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2004-04-21 18:18:54 | Re: 7.3.4 on Linux: UPDATE .. foo=foo+1 degrades massivly over time |