| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |
| Date: | 2004-04-21 18:16:14 |
| Message-ID: | 4086BA6E.70105@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
My personal opinion is that contrib should be removed entirely. Just
have a contrib.txt that says all contrib modules are at pgfoundry or
whatever.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Jan Wieck wrote:
> Taking into account that quite a few people have repeatedly stated that
> the components in contrib are considered more supported/recommended than
> similar solutions found on gborg or any other external site, I suggest
> we move the projects dbmirror and dblink to gborg. The rserv contrib
> module seems to me to be an early Perl prototype of erserver, nobody is
> working on any more. I suggest we drop that entirely.
>
> Comments/alternatives?
>
>
> Jan
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-04-21 18:17:36 | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-04-21 17:48:48 | contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |