| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Swan <tswan(at)idigx(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Boes <jboes(at)nexcerpt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_autovacuum crashes when query fails for temp |
| Date: | 2004-04-21 05:17:11 |
| Message-ID: | 408603D7.5080505@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
> Ok, so I will change pg_autovacuum to explicitly ignore temp tables.
> Just to be sure, I can do this by avoiding anything found in the pg_temp
> schemea, or is there a better way? Is it possible that a user could or
> would put a non-temp table the pg_temp schemea?
There's no such thing as the pg_temp schema, you will get lots of
pg_temp_xxx schemas I think.
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2004-04-21 05:23:05 | Re: Duplicate variable declared? |
| Previous Message | mike g | 2004-04-21 04:48:49 | Duplicate variable declared? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2004-04-21 05:23:05 | Re: Duplicate variable declared? |
| Previous Message | mike g | 2004-04-21 04:48:49 | Duplicate variable declared? |