Re: pg_encoding not needed anymore

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_encoding not needed anymore
Date: 2004-04-20 20:54:25
Message-ID: 40858E01.1030209@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>
>> g a data store for many databases, not a single database. But I
>> think it is far too sanctified by history to change now, just as Ken
>> Thompson now wishes he had put an 'e' on the end of 'creat' but can't
>> go back and fix it. Maybe we should think about a symlink/hardlink to
>> use a better name.
>
>
>
> initcatalog?
>

initpgstore ... we can play the name game if people are serious :-)

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-04-20 22:03:17 Re: Multiple statements in one prepare
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-04-20 20:46:32 Re: pg_encoding not needed anymore