Re: trigger SPI_exec count argument

From: Michael Nacos <m(dot)nacos(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: trigger SPI_exec count argument
Date: 2009-09-02 16:13:18
Message-ID: 407fa4640909020913p2d560b35jd7eca9f87ae1aaff@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

This is from within SPI_exec:

Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..115947.18 rows=1952242 width=25) (actual
time=0.095..6425.291 rows=1952202 loops=1)
  ->  Index Scan using othertable_level_pkey on othertable
(cost=0.00..9.34 rows=1 width=25) (actual time=0.063..0.067 rows=1
loops=1)
        Index Cond: ((level = 0) AND (pkey = '123456'::text))
  ->  Seq Scan on sometable target  (cost=0.00..96415.42 rows=1952242
width=0) (actual time=0.025..2333.743 rows=1952202 loops=1)
Total runtime: 9613.094 ms

Now, there seems to be a stray FROM inside the trigger code, as in:

UPDATE %s SET key = '%s', val = '%s' FROM %s target WHERE ....

thanks to incremental change :-) removing the stray FROM has given:

Index Scan using othertable_level_pri on othertable (cost=0.00..9.34
rows=1 width=25) (actual time=0.109..0.110 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((level = 0) AND (pkey = '123456'::text))
Total runtime: 0.162 ms

which is exactly what I got from the psql version, which did not have
the stray FROM part.

so, it turns out the sql was not identical inside the trigger -- my mistake...

The interesting thing is SQL_exec(sql,1) resulted in a different
execution plan while the stray FROM was still in place.

regards, Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2009-09-02 16:24:45 Re: Adding \ev view editor?
Previous Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2009-09-02 15:37:08 Re: Linux LSB init script