Re: postgresql and syslog

From: Michael Nacos <m(dot)nacos(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ibrahim Harrani <ibrahim(dot)harrani(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql and syslog
Date: 2009-08-07 13:06:34
Message-ID: 407fa4640908070606y1ff4f60fj7e0eccf632c0457e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

we have actually gone the opposite way and switched to using syslog
for logging purposes some time ago, with no performance issues.

syslog files are easily read by a lot of applications out there. We have
been using rsyslog for aggregating logs from multiple servers, splunk
for analysis purposes and pgfouine for routine reports.

I would be very surprised if logging had a significant overhead any method
you choose. there's probably something very wrong with your setup if this
is the case.

just another dimension, Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-08-07 19:56:50 Re: postgresql and syslog
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-08-07 12:53:43 Re: SQL select query becomes slow when using limit (with no offset)