Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Date: 2010-03-02 09:49:31
Message-ID: 407d949e1003020149u42b07216w22376e08b9a2a456@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

We should probably also check and prohibit including directories as files.

On Tuesday, March 2, 2010, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> In the meantime, it seems like we ought to take two defensive steps:

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Asher Hoskins 2010-03-02 10:47:03 to_timestamp() and quarters
Previous Message Adrian von Bidder 2010-03-02 07:49:13 Re: Optimizer: ranges and partial indices? Or use partitioning?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-03-02 09:58:20 Re: WAL replay does not verify integrity
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-03-02 09:48:28 Re: pg_stop_backup does not complete