From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Streaming replication and non-blocking I/O |
Date: | 2009-12-22 11:36:03 |
Message-ID: | 407d949e0912220336u595a05e0x20bd91b9fbc08d4d@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I think we can just use load_external_function() to load the library and
> call WalReceiverMain from AuxiliaryProcessMain(). Ie. hard-code the
> library name. Walreceiver is quite tightly coupled with the rest of the
> backend anyway, so I don't think we need to come up with a pluggable API
> at the moment.
Please? I am really interested in replacing walsender and walreceiver
with something which uses a communication bus like spread instead of a
single point to point connection.
ISTM if we start with something tightly coupled it'll be hard to
decouple later. Whereas if we start with a limited interface we'll
learn just how much information is really required by the modules and
will have fewer surprises later when we find suprising
interdependencies.
--
greg
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2009-12-22 11:41:30 | Re: alpha3 release schedule? |
Previous Message | Florian Pflug | 2009-12-22 11:32:35 | Re: alpha3 release schedule? |