From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com> |
Cc: | Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: join from array or cursor |
Date: | 2009-08-21 13:22:54 |
Message-ID: | 407d949e0908210622q1fc0efdfxca73756df371d0b4@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Greg Stark<gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:16 PM, John DeSoi<desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, this is the best I have come up with so far. I have a set returning
>> function which returns the key and the index number. The implementation with
>> a cursor looks like this:
>>
>> SELECT * FROM cursor_pk('c1') c LEFT JOIN foo ON (c.pk = foo.pk) ORDER BY
>> c.idx;
>
> This might be a circumstance where it's really best to just force the
> planner to use a particular plan. There's no way to tell it "the order
> of the array" without forcing an entirely unnecessary sort.
Of course immediately upon hitting send I did think of a way:
SELECT (r).*
FROM (SELECT (SELECT x FROM x WHERE a=id) AS r
FROM unnest(array[1,2]) AS arr(id)
) AS subq;
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2009-08-21 13:44:43 | Re: Questions about encoding between two databases |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2009-08-21 13:16:33 | Re: join from array or cursor |