From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Jake Stride <jake(at)omelett(dot)es> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Strange Planner Issues |
Date: | 2009-07-29 20:06:31 |
Message-ID: | 407d949e0907291306x36041bc9k21fdab55c6794cc5@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Jake Stride<jake(at)omelett(dot)es> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have 2 databases running on the same server. One is a dump of the
> other, however the query plans for the same query on the same tables
> in each database is wildly different and I cannot work out why.
> -> Seq Scan on
> person_contact_methods e (cost=0.00..3281.89 rows=1 width=8) (actual
> time=114.181..114.181 rows=0 loops=1)
> Filter: (main AND
> ((contact)::text ~~* 'jake(at)omelett(dot)es'::text) AND (type =
> 'E'::bpchar))
> -> Seq Scan on person_contact_methods e (cost=0.00..2942.06
> rows=1 width=8) (actual time=3.718..184.602 rows=772 loops=1)
> Filter: (("type" = 'E'::bpchar) AND main AND
> ((contact)::text ~~* 'jake(at)omelett(dot)es'::text))
They don't look like the same data from here. One has no matching
records in this table and the other has over 700.
--
greg
http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Antonio José García Lagar | 2009-07-29 21:05:36 | Re: OID in $_TD->{new}/$_TD->{old} |
Previous Message | Jake Stride | 2009-07-29 19:02:51 | Re: Query optimisation and sorting on external merge |