Re: multi-threaded pgbench

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: multi-threaded pgbench
Date: 2009-07-18 19:40:04
Message-ID: 407d949e0907181240w31f08441kea2e3ca6fcfdb5c0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Itagaki
> Takahiro<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> Here is an updated version of multi-threaded pgbench patch.
>
> Greg (Smith), do you have time to review this version?  If not, I will
> assign a round-robin reviewer when one becomes available.

Incidentally you could assign me something if you want.

I gave feedback on Simon/Your join removal and the Append min/max
patch. I don't think either has really reached any conclusive
"finished" state though. I suppose I should mark your patch as
"returned with feedback" even if it's mostly just "good work, keep
going"? And the other patch isn't actually in this commitfest but I
think we're still discussing what it should do.

--
greg
http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-07-18 20:01:58 Re: SE-PostgreSQL?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-07-18 19:25:03 Re: multi-threaded pgbench